BLUE APPROVED

Discuss the FN lineup of tactical rifles; the FS2000, SCAR, and the venerable FAL.
Post Reply
ynoty3k
Senior Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: 29 May 2009, 19:13
custom title: Hoplophile

BLUE APPROVED

Post by ynoty3k » 29 Oct 2010, 13:09

so darn new the spec and features sections are empty on the site, but we do know it's in .308, and capable of sub MOA out to 1,000 yards and beyond!

http://www.fnhusa.com/mil/products/fire ... id=FNM0005" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image

User avatar
f3rr37
Site Admin
Posts: 14670
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 12:09

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by f3rr37 » 29 Oct 2010, 13:17

:drool:

ynoty3k
Senior Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: 29 May 2009, 19:13
custom title: Hoplophile

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by ynoty3k » 29 Oct 2010, 13:45

where'd that smiley come from? It sure is fitting.

I'm betting on a price near 4500. But sure would like one. Especially in .338L

romer522
Senior Member
Posts: 2494
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:04
Location: WA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by romer522 » 29 Oct 2010, 14:51

I suspect FN is putting their accurate-chrome-lined barrel manufacturing skills to good use.

sabotteur
Senior Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 21 Aug 2008, 07:39
custom title: Big Dog Outfitters
Location: A small farm in BFE Virginia
Contact:

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by sabotteur » 29 Oct 2010, 15:10

Damn, another toy to add to the list.

Bones
Senior Member
Posts: 611
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 15:11
custom title: Bones
Location: Newport News, VA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by Bones » 29 Oct 2010, 18:30

Very Sweet indeed but SUB MOA out to 1000 and beyond. No way!

User avatar
SHEEPDOG
Gold Member
Posts: 839
Joined: 27 May 2010, 14:22
custom title: A.K.A. DW

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by SHEEPDOG » 29 Oct 2010, 20:18

I would have to call BS on that too. 338L but not 308. At 1000yrd + there are so many variables that I guess they can claim anything.

User42
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: 29 Sep 2008, 20:22

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by User42 » 29 Oct 2010, 22:31

Now that is a Scar I would want to buy. If it's .308, I may forgo waiting on the RFB.
If a man dedicates his life to good deeds and the welfare of others, He will die unthanked and unremembered. If he exercises his genius bringing death and misery to billions, his name will echo down through the millennia for a hundred lifetimes.

romer522
Senior Member
Posts: 2494
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:04
Location: WA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by romer522 » 29 Oct 2010, 22:36

swe123 wrote:I would have to call BS on that too. 338L but not 308. At 1000yrd + there are so many variables that I guess they can claim anything.
Sub MOA rifle/equipment and sub MOA shooting are two different things.

The barrel is 90% when it all breaks down, and considering they know how to make sub half minute chrome lined barrels already I don't think sub MOA out of a semi-auto is too big of a claim to be unrealistic.

fooschnickens
Senior Member
Posts: 2826
Joined: 17 Mar 2009, 17:34
custom title: ~( ̄∇ ̄~) (~ ̄∇ ̄)~
Location: Hotlanta GA
Contact:

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by fooschnickens » 30 Oct 2010, 08:41

Zang. My FNAR plans may have just been ousted...
Image
http://www.f00tography.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Corporation: n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.
-Ambrose Bierce

ynoty3k
Senior Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: 29 May 2009, 19:13
custom title: Hoplophile

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by ynoty3k » 30 Oct 2010, 08:43

haha FNAR? What's that ***** ****?

User avatar
flyingirish04
Gold Member
Posts: 4784
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 21:42
custom title: Mtn Man in Flatland
Location: Great Plains, USA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by flyingirish04 » 30 Oct 2010, 12:56

Sub MOA is only part based on the firearm. Out at distance, load type and bullet BC takes over. 308 Win really tops out around 1200 yards. After that the bullet starts to fall out of the sky due to its lower powder charge combined with 30 caliber bullet. A 7mm Mag, 300 Win, and 338L has enough charge and BC on bullets to hold sub MOA groups past that range, the 338L reaching as far as any 50 BMG will.

Just to clear up some terminology being thrown out here, Sub MOA means less than 1" groups at 100 yards. That is all it means. Therefore, sub MOA would be a group less than 10" at 1000 yards. Any gun that is sub MOA will shoot that way to the operational effective range of the round, regardless of the rifle. A $600 Tikka T3 7mm Mag will shoot as tight as any Gucci brand 1 MOA gun that costs four times that.
Killed Two Stones with One Bird.

User avatar
SHEEPDOG
Gold Member
Posts: 839
Joined: 27 May 2010, 14:22
custom title: A.K.A. DW

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by SHEEPDOG » 30 Oct 2010, 16:40

flyingirish04 wrote:Sub MOA is only part based on the firearm. Out at distance, load type and bullet BC takes over. 308 Win really tops out around 1200 yards. After that the bullet starts to fall out of the sky due to its lower powder charge combined with 30 caliber bullet. A 7mm Mag, 300 Win, and 338L has enough charge and BC on bullets to hold sub MOA groups past that range, the 338L reaching as far as any 50 BMG will.

Just to clear up some terminology being thrown out here, Sub MOA means less than 1" groups at 100 yards. That is all it means. Therefore, sub MOA would be a group less than 10" at 1000 yards. Any gun that is sub MOA will shoot that way to the operational effective range of the round, regardless of the rifle. A $600 Tikka T3 7mm Mag will shoot as tight as any Gucci brand 1 MOA gun that costs four times that.
You are exactly right! Sorry if I was not clear. My point was that I dont think they can prove it in the real world. A 308 would not be my choice for a thousand yard head shot or paper plate. Most people have never shot five hundred yards. It's kind of a mute point.

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12939
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by Rapier1772 » 30 Oct 2010, 17:43

swe123 wrote:Most people have never shot five hundred yards. It's kind of a mute point.
Is the requirement just to have a bullet go that far or go that far with any intention of accuracy? :laugh:
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
flyingirish04
Gold Member
Posts: 4784
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 21:42
custom title: Mtn Man in Flatland
Location: Great Plains, USA

Re: BLUE APPROVED

Post by flyingirish04 » 31 Oct 2010, 14:16

You mean moot point ;).
Killed Two Stones with One Bird.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests