Ruger SR-762 Pics

Talk about your favorite longguns here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vortec MAX
Gold Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 17:56
Location: Idaho

Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Vortec MAX » 16 Nov 2013, 20:48

Here are some pics of my new Ruger SR-762 rifle. Yes... more gun porn.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Of course I could not leave it alone after I brought it home, so it already has a Geissele SSA-E trigger, Gemtech/Smith Vortex flash hider (with lugs), and a Noveske QD Swivel endplate.

I have ordered a Magpul ACS stock, a Larue Tactical quick release riser, and a set of 1" high rings to get the Nikon M-308 above that Samson rear BUIS.

I will come back with a range report once I shoot it. I have already taken the rifle apart, cleaned it, and put it back together. I am pretty impressed with the build quality. My only complaints are; the stock is cheap and wobbles on the extension tube, and there were no QD swivel holes anywhere.

Mike

Mister Freeze
Senior Member
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 11:11
custom title: 159.6
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Mister Freeze » 18 Nov 2013, 07:20

Aside from what seems to be an adjustable gas system, how is that any different than any other AR-10? I'm in the market for a semiauto 7.62x51. While I dream of an M1A, I've also been eyeing the RFB. I had an Armalite AR-10 back in the day, and simply felt is was just a big AR. When I initially heard about the SR762, I got excited, until I found out it was an AR.

User avatar
Vortec MAX
Gold Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 17:56
Location: Idaho

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Vortec MAX » 18 Nov 2013, 07:55

The deciding factors for me were:

It was inexpensive
I trust the Ruger brand
It was a piston gun (with adj. gas)
It was inexpensive
It had a Mil-spec trigger group and extension tube
It had a plated bolt and carrier
It was inexpensive
I like the proportions (barrel didn't seem to stick out too far)
It was almost a pound lighter than its competitors
It was inexpensive
It accepts (and ships with) PMAG magazines
It had nice BUIS already installed
It was inexpensive

The POF is $800 more. The SIG 716 was at least $200 more and nearly a pound heavier.

Mike

toyslr
Senior Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 09:56
Location: Cypress, Texas
Contact:

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by toyslr » 18 Nov 2013, 09:20

Rugers piston AR's are one of the best buys on the market! You get reliability, brand recognition, on the .223's the sights and rail system is
furnished by Troy Indust., ships with mags and a case

User avatar
Cyberfly
Global Moderator
Posts: 10624
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 18:44
custom title: Mens Room Attendant
Location: SE OKlahoma

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Cyberfly » 18 Nov 2013, 20:26

I want SO bad...
Never confuse 'The will of the Majority' with 'The will of God'.
**This post created with 100% recycled photons!**

Mister Freeze
Senior Member
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 11:11
custom title: 159.6
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Mister Freeze » 19 Nov 2013, 07:01

Vortec MAX wrote:The deciding factors for me were:

It was inexpensive
I trust the Ruger brand
It was a piston gun (with adj. gas)
It was inexpensive
It had a Mil-spec trigger group and extension tube
It had a plated bolt and carrier
It was inexpensive
I like the proportions (barrel didn't seem to stick out too far)
It was almost a pound lighter than its competitors
It was inexpensive
It accepts (and ships with) PMAG magazines
It had nice BUIS already installed
It was inexpensive

The POF is $800 more. The SIG 716 was at least $200 more and nearly a pound heavier.

Mike


OK, fair enough. But how's the price?

:p

User avatar
Vortec MAX
Gold Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 17:56
Location: Idaho

Re: Ruger SR-762 Pics

Post by Vortec MAX » 19 Nov 2013, 08:20

I did I forget to mention... the price was good too. :D

Mike

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests