Magtech 165gr +P, and 230gr +P Ranger T vs Pork Shoulders

Forum for discussing factory & reloading non-5.7x28mm ammunition.
Post Reply
Buffman
Silver Member
Posts: 2879
Joined: 12 Jan 2009, 22:48
Location: SW Michigan
Contact:

Magtech 165gr +P, and 230gr +P Ranger T vs Pork Shoulders

Post by Buffman » 29 Oct 2013, 13:37

Magtech, actually did pretty well in my opinion. It penetrated well even after striking bone almost immediately after entering the medium. Would have liked to see more damage to tissues, but it's overall expansion and penetration, are not bad at all.


Ranger T will mess you up


User avatar
Vortec MAX
Gold Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 17:56
Location: Idaho

Re: Magtech 165gr +P, and 230gr +P Ranger T vs Pork Shoulder

Post by Vortec MAX » 29 Oct 2013, 14:05

I have a couple of boxes of that Ranger T +P stuff. I haven't shot any because I didn't know if I can shoot +P through my SIG P220.

It looks like wicked stuff.

Thanks for the vids.

Mike

jckilla
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 31 Jul 2010, 18:46
custom title: jckilla
Location: Tempe

Re: Magtech 165gr +P, and 230gr +P Ranger T vs Pork Shoulder

Post by jckilla » 29 Oct 2013, 17:10

Buff - thanks for testing the Magtech ammo - looks great. A lot of weight differential in the bullet ( 165 grain vs 230 grain in the Ranger ) and that Magtech round obliterated the bone. Little too expensive tho - I'll probably just keep the rest of the box loaded up in my G21C - Thanks again pal, as always, Great Work!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest